Categories
Columns

Why are there so few women who are political cartoonists?

I’m constantly being asked why there are
so few women that are editorial cartoonists. I don’t have a good
answer for that. One of the few female cartoonists on our site,
altie cartoonist Jen Sorensen, wrote an excellent column on
the topic for Campus
Progress
and has graciously allowed us to reprint it here.

Wanted: Female Cartoonist

By Jen Sorensen




Why are there so few female political cartoonists? I’ve been
asked that question many times over the years. It’s OK, I don’t
mind. We’re something of a rare breed. Exact statistics are difficult
to find-even the national group Association of American Editorial
Cartoonists can only estimate the national number of political
cartoonists, let alone break them down by gender, ethnicity,
or class. But to give you a rough idea, of the association’s
185 current regular members, only 15 are women. I’m one of them.



My short (and admittedly Zen-like) explanation is that there
are so few female political cartoonists largely because there
are so few female political cartoonists. Drawing cartoons and
comics has traditionally been a guy thing-a somewhat nerdy guy
thing, but a guy thing nonetheless. Without role models who look
like you, or friends with similar interests, any activity becomes
less inviting. It might not even cross your mind as a possibility.



But when did political cartooning first become the province of
dudes? Patriot dude Ben Franklin is widely credited with the
first American political cartoon: The famous "Join or Die" drawing of
the chopped-up snake representing the 13 original colonies
.
In the 1870s, a dude named Thomas Nast became the first major
editorial page cartoonist, followed by 20th-century dudely doodlers
such as Bill Mauldin and Herbert "Herblock" Block.
In 1915, Edwina Dumm became the first American non-dude
to work full-time as an editorial cartoonist
, a remarkable
feat considering women didn’t win the right to vote until 1920.
Given that women were deemed irrational, not expected to hold
intellectual jobs, and certainly not supposed to have political
opinions, the skewed demographics of the profession don’t seem
all that mysterious.



A more contemporary problem comes in the form of profitable and
supposedly progressive web publications like The Huffington Post
that make it a policy not to pay for content. This business model
presumes contributors have other sources of income; paying in
"exposure" instead. If this setup becomes the industry
standard, those without ample resources, especially women and
minorities, will simply not be able to afford to survive as political
cartoonists.



The challenges faced by female cartoonists parallel those of
female op-ed writers. Washington Post columnist Ruth Marcus recently
suggested
that the dearth of female op-ed writers in newspapers
is largely due to the imposition of "our own glass ceiling"
as opposed to editors’ sexism. Women need to show more chutzpah,
she argues. We must close the "cockiness gap" between
ourselves and the great hordes of brashly bloviating males.



As
Katha Pollitt has rightly noted
, however, there’s an abundance
of highly qualified and willing female writers whose numbers
are not reflected on the commentary pages of major newspapers.
The op-ed pages of the Post feature two women and 23 men, despite
the fact that plenty of women write about politics and current
events.



Clearly, forces beyond "our own glass ceilings" are
at work. In the case of political cartoonists, however, there
aren’t quite so many women waiting in the wings.



This is not to cut Marcus any slack. Her argument fails to address
the often subtle ways in which gender inequality works. If there
is a cockiness gap, it might have something to do with ye olde
double standard that ambitious women are perceived as you-know-whats.
To be fair, Marcus does facetiously refer to "a certain
unbecoming arrogance" required of outspoken women, but she
paradoxically blames women for not displaying it.



Media coverage of cartoonists works the same way. The Columbia Journalism Review recently interviewed
political cartoonists and editors
about their opinion of
the controversial New Yorker cover; they spoke with nine men
and zero women.



So how did I buck the trend? It’s hard to say. I do know I recognized
the unfairness of gender roles from a very early age, even though
nobody slipped a copy of The Feminine Mystique into my playpen.
My parents did indulge my tomboyish tendencies, though, buying
me reams of comics and copies of MAD Magazine. As teachers, they
also valued education and creativity, and were fully supportive
of my round-the-clock cartooning habit. There wasn’t much else
to do where we lived; as far as I was concerned, drawing comics
was how I entertained myself.



While in college in the mid-1990s, I was invited to submit to
an all-female comic anthology called Action Girl. This was my
professional debut. Thanks in part to Action Girl, I was motivated
to publish my own comic book after graduating. The result: Slowpoke
Comix #1, a collection of short stories that were precursors
to my weekly strip. One marked the debut of my character Drooly
Julie, a randy femme with a penchant for stubbly metalheads.
It was only after the 2000 election that my work took a sharp
political turn, as did that of many other cartoonists. As I crossed
this threshold, I wasn’t thinking much about breaking gender
barriers. I was just freaked out by the country’s sudden takeover
by wackadoos.



Over the years, my work appeared in more and more places, often
alternative newsweeklies. These papers tended to be more progressive-minded
than mainstream media, and I never got the sense that I was going
up against a wall of chauvinism. I do get the sense, however,
that some progressive publications don’t try as hard as they
could to diversify their mastheads. As Women In Media and News founder Jennifer Pozner
puts it, one of the biggest obstacles appears to be time
:
It can take longer and require more effort to look beyond the
familiar or entrenched stables of male cartoonists and editorial
writers.



Despite these occasional frustrations, the past decade suggests
that the situation is improving. If my favorite comic convention,
the Small Press Expo in Maryland, is any indication, there are
more women than ever on both sides of the exhibitor tables. To
invoke the flip side of my Zen koan: The more female cartoonists
there are, the more there will be.



Jen Sorensen draws Slowpoke Comics. She recently
released
Slowpoke: One Nation, Oh My God! It is great! Click here
to buy it. C’mon.

Categories
Columns

I am “mean spirited”

Here, the editor of the Hattiesburg
American explains
their newspaper’s
decision to run my "mean spirited" Palin cartoon (even though the cartoon is
just awful) in the face of angry reader reaction.

Categories
Columns

Three New Cartoonists

We just added three new cartoonists to
the site. Actually, they are three old cartoonists who are coming
back after some time away.

The first is Brian Duffy of the Des Moines
Register. Brian is one of only two cartoonists whose color cartoons
appear every day on the front page of a large metropolitcan daily
newspaper (the other is Corky Trinidad of the Honolulu Star-Bulletin).
Welcome back, Brian! Click to see more of Brian’s work.

Next is Jonathan Shapiro, the mega award-winning
cartoonist from South Africa who draws under the name "Zapiro."
Jonathan was the winner of the Cartoonists Rights Network’s courage
in Editorial Cartoonists Award for drawing in the face of threats
to his safety. Click to see more of Zapiro’s work.

And next is
Sepideh Amjarooz, a rare woman editorial cartoonist from Iran
(where our web site is blocked by the government). Sepideh has
a charming style which is very different that what our Western
eyes expect. She didn’t update her cartoons for a while, and
we dropped her slot, then she wrote to say, "put me back
up!" and that’s what we’re doing. Click to see more of Sepideh’s work.

Categories
Columns

The Fickle Media is Always the Same

The fickle media is always the same – no
one has ever noticed that, so I thought I would demonstrate.
Here’s my latest cartoon, showing the fickle media "changing"
from their fixation on Obama to Sarah Palin.

But it wasn’t long ago when we started
the primary season, and the media went from blanket coverage
of the Iowa Caucuses to the New Hampshire Primary.



This was quite a popular cartoon, but it wasn’t good for very
long. Once the New Hampshire pirmary was over, I needed a new
one.



Hey, every state is cute, and nobody notices that the fickle
media is always the same. Remember when that nutty pedophile
in Thailand confessed to the murder of Jon Benet Ramsey, and
the media all chased after him?

Then there was the time that the heat was
on Karl Rove over his role in outing Valerie Plame, and Rove
was saved from media attention by President Bush announcing a
Supreme Court nominee, and then everyone lost interest in Rove.
Yes, the same fickle media.



Now, remember way back to the last presidential primaries, when
Howard Dean started losing, and John Kerry started winning …







Then there was the end of the Bill Clinton administration, when
Bill stepped out of the White House, Hillary stepped into the
Senate.





And, two years before that, here in California, the fickle media
dogged Senator Barbara Boxer, as she was running for re-election,
avoiding questions about Monica Lewinski.



The fickle media never changes over the
years – but they sure are easy to draw.

Categories
Columns

My Art for the First Debate

The
first presidential debate is going to be held at the University
of Mississippi, which hired me to do an illustration for the
event – here it is on their current "Ole Miss"
magazine cover. They will be using it for other stuff associated
with the debate too, probably the programs or a poster or something.
It would be fun if they would blow it up big as a backdrop (somehow
I doubt that they’ll do that, but thanks, Ole Miss!)

My book publisher (Que/Pearson Education)
liked it too, and it will also be the cover of our upcoming BIG
Book of Campaign 2008 Cartoons, which is slated to be in stores
in a month. Today, my loyal assistant, Stacey, and I did an urgent, last
minute edit to fit more Palin cartoons into the book.

Categories
Columns

Bristol Palin is OFF LIMITS

Republicans operatives are screaming that
Sarah Palin’s family is off limits and the media should lay off; even Barack Obama agrees. What they don’t seem to realize
is that by saying that, they are only encouraging the cartoonists
to draw more. We just put up a Palin’s pregnant daughter collection; we’ll
keep updating it as new cartoons flood in. Here are some of my
favorites, by Peter Nicholson, Nate Beeler, Mr. Fish and Pat Bagley.










Categories
Columns

Jim Borgman to Retire from Editorial Cartooning

The editorial cartoonist community is buzzing
with the news that Jim Borgman will be retiring from editorial
cartooning at the end of the month. Borgman draws the comic
strip "Zits" with Jerry Scott; it looks like a lot
of work to hold down both jobs, so the decision doesn’t seem
surprising. Borgman took a buyout from the shrinking Enquirer
and will draw a new, local weekly cartoon for the newspaper as
a freelancer.

Categories
Columns

Crazy, Angry Response to my Pregnant Bristol Palin Cartoon

We have comments in the blog now and quite
a spirited discussion on my pregnant Bristol Palin
cartoon below
. It is fascinating to see the outrage from
the conservatives over my choice to depict the pregnant teen
in a cartoon. I would remind the righties that it was Sarah Palin
who chose to put her family in front of the camera and who has
been so vocal in her opposition to birth control and sex education
in schools; the abstinence-only sex education that she supports
doesn’t work, and the pregnant teenage daughter she chose to
have stand behind her on stage illustrates the point.